5. Specific Guidelines: Events/Other
5.2 Pre-Confederation Events
5.3 Assessing the Role of Organized Religion in the Social Development of Canada
5.4 Ethnic or Religious Groups
5.5 Disasters and Disaster Areas
5.6 Commemoration of Post-Secondary Educational Institutions
5.7 Commemoration of Political Parties
5.8 Commemoration of Individual Regiments
In 1923, the subject of settlements throughout Canada was thoroughly gone into in all its phases, and the following resolution was passed:
That the Board has considered with care the communication of Mr. W.H. Breithaupt, President of the Waterloo Historical Society, with reference to the proposed monuments to commemorate the pioneers of the County of Waterloo, as well as representations from other districts as to similar proposals therein, and desires to express its hearty approval of every effort to perpetuate and honour the memory of the founders of settlements, throughout the Dominion, and its high appreciation of Mr. Breithaupt's patriotic objects and efforts.
The Board, however, has to deal with so many sites of outstanding national importance which require priority of action that it feels it would not be advisable for it to undertake at present action in the matter of the placing of memorials in connection with early settlements in Canada.
This policy has been reaffirmed numerous times. For example,
in October 1967:
In connection with the proposal to commemorate the Founding of Pictou, the Board reaffirmed its policy of not recommending the commemoration of settlement origins; but recommended that the Department suggest to the Government of Nova Scotia the appropriateness of a provincially sponsored commemoration.
In October 1969:
The Board reaffirmed its policy of not recommending the origins of existing communities for commemoration, but considered that the significance of former settlements and colonizing ventures should be considered each on its own merits.
In November 1973, the Board recommended that:
pre-Confederation events should be regarded on their individual merits on a line basis, i.e., as significant events in the development of a region which later became a province of Canada.
In November 1973, the Board enunciated that:
while recognizing the overwhelming impact of organized religion on the development of Canada, prefers for the present that the Board should deal with items in this category on an individual basis as they arise and that they be reviewed in the light of the Policy Statement's first stated [guidelines], i.e., a site, structure or object shall be closely associated or identified with events that have shaped Canadian history in a prominent way, or illustrate effectively the broad cultural, social, political, economic or military patterns of Canadian history.
In November 1977, the Board recommended that:
religious and ethnic groups, per se should not be specifically commemorated but that we should pay particular attention to the contributions of such ethnic and religious groups as represented in buildings of national architectural or historical significance, individual leaders of national importance, or events of national historic significance.
In June 2002, the joint Cultural Community and Criteria Committees
recommended, and the Board accepted, that this guideline be amended
The Board will assess the national historic significance of places, persons and events associated with the experience of ethnic or religious groups in Canada, rather than advocating an approach that would consider the commemoration of ethnic or religious groups themselves.
In November 1982:
Following considerable discussion, the Board was unanimous in its recommendation that:
it continue to be guided in its deliberations by the 1967 "National Historic Sites Policy"
Amended as follows:
normally disasters will be excluded from consideration by the Board unless there is evidence that their long-term impact has been such that they would merit consideration under Criterion 1.6.ii of the general Board criteria [in the "Parks Canada Policy" (1979)], that is to say-as events which shaped Canadian history.
In November 1997, the Board reviewed its existing guideline
agreed that it would consider only the most exceptional disasters if they were seen to have caused changes to some facet of Canadian society, for example, changes to social programs, public policy, or causing long-standing economic impacts.
In February 1992, following three requests in one year asking that it consider the possible national significance of institutions of higher learning, the Board asked the Criteria Committee to reflect on the matter. In November 1992, the Committee and, in turn, the Board recommended:
that due to the increasing number and complexity of post-secondary institutions which have been established in recent decades, and the consequent difficulty of assessing their significance to Canada in a rigorous and equitable manner, the Board should no longer recommend the commemoration of such institutions, per se. The Board, however, should continue to consider nationally significant aspects of universities, colleges and training schools, such as founders, administrators, faculty members, benefactors, and individual faculties or departments, as well as school and university architecture and research contributions.
In July 2009, following a discussion of the report on the Communist Party of Canada, the Board recognized that in its 90 years of existence, political parties had never been recommended for designation, the Board having preferred to recommend persons, places and events associated with political themes rather than parties. Therefore the Board determined:
that political parties will not be considered for designation.
In November 1977, the Committee, and then the Board, recommended
that, in accordance with Board Policy, it is not feasible to commemorate individual regiments, per se, nevertheless their contribution could be recognized by their association with persons, places or events of national historic significance.
This policy was reaffirmed in July 2007
In connection with the proposal to commemorate the Black Watch Armoury on the grounds of the building’s association with the Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment) of Canada and the regiment’s and building’s relationship to the community of Montréal, the Board recommended the commemoration of the Black Watch (Royal Highland Regiment) of Canada Armoury as a national historic site.
In December 2014
The Board recognized the contribution of the Royal 22nd Regiment by expanding the reasons for designation of the Québec Citadel thus, recognizing the importance of the role of this regiment at this location.
Note: See section 8.3 for direction on transportation routes.