|
|
 |
Banff National Park of Canada
Park Management
Trans-Canada Highway Twinning
The Banff Wildlife Crossings Project Report, 2002
TRANS-CANADA HIGHWAY TWINNING
Twinning the highway involved upgrading the highway from two lanes to four
lanes as seen in the following photo
Two lanes - ca 1955
© Parks Canada / Bruno
Engler
|
Four lanes - 1998
© Parks Canada
|
Since the mid-1970s, collisions
between vehicles and large mammals on the TCH have been a concern of
Parks Canada. Increasing traffic and vehicle collisions with wildlife
during the 1980s prompted Parks Canada to upgrade the first 27 km of
highway in Banff to four lanes (Phase 1 and 2; map below). To reduce
the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions, a 2.4 m high ungulate-proof
fence was installed along both sides of the twinned highway. To minimize
the disruption of wildlife movements, wildlife underpasses were incorporated
into the highway design. In the mid-1990s, similar concerns regarding
increasing traffic demands and maintaining park ecological
integrity prompted Parks Canada to widen an additional 18 km to
four lanes (Phase 3A; map below), complete with fencing, wildlife underpasses
and overpasses.

Overview of all the phases (1, 2, 3A and
3B) of the Trans-Canada Highway, Banff National Park
© Parks Canada |
Mitigation
Measures
Wildlife crossing structures
Five different types of wildlife crossing structures are found in Banff:
(1) creek bridge underpasses (3 m high x 11 m wide expanded bridges
that span creeks and rivers),
© Tony Clevenger |

(2) elliptical, metal culvert underpasses
(4 m high x 7 m wide),
© Tony Clevenger |

(3) prefabricated concrete box underpasses
(2.5 m x 3.0 m),
© Tony Clevenger |
(4)open-span concrete bridge underpass (3 m high x 11 m wide),
and
© Tony Clevenger |

(5) 50-m wide wildlife overpasses.
© Tony Clevenger |
The two 50-m wide wildlife overpasses were the first of this magnitude to
be built in North America. Three considerations were taken into account for
overpass placement; preferred wildlife crossing points, favorable terrain
configuration for engineering and construction considerations, and driver
safety requirements. Earth berms were built on the
overpasses to reduce disturbance (noise, lights) from highway traffic.
Earth berms on overpass
© Tony Clevenger |
Fencing and one-way gates
2.4 m high wildlife fence
© Tony Clevenger |
The mitigated section of TCH (45 km) is bordered on both sides with
a 2.4 m high wildlife fence, to help keep wildlife off the right-of-way
and direct wildlife to the crossing structures. The phase 1 & 2
fence is not buried as it was primarily designed to keep ungulates off
the road and not coyotes and wolves who can dig under the fence. However,
the phase 3A fence is buried, having a 1.5-m apron that extends into
the ground at a 45-degree angle away from the fence.

Wildlife fence with apron
© Tony Clevenger |
One-way gates were installed along the fence on phase 1 & 2 to provide
an escape for animals that have entered into the highway right-of-way.

One way Gate
© Tony Clevenger |
Where fencing intersects roads leading to the highway, Texas gates have been
placed in the road to keep wildlife from entering the right-of-ways.

Texas Gate
© Tony Clevenger |
Double-door swing gates and pedestrian gates are used to allow human access
beyond the highway right-of-way.
Double door swing gate
© Tony Clevenger |

Pedestrian Gate
© Tony Clevenger |
< Previous
Page | Table
of Contents | Next
Page >
|